Skip to content

Settings and activity

9 results found

  1. 84 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Product Feedback » Administration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Darren Aitcheson supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darren Aitcheson commented  · 

    SAML authentication would also be useful - every other tool in our CI/CD toolchain supports it, but not Octopus. If you're going to be taken seriously as an enterprise-level tool, you need to start implementing this kind of thing folks.

  2. 148 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Consideration  ·  16 comments  ·  Product Feedback » Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darren Aitcheson commented  · 

    Second this - integration with Vault (also the Hashicorp Enterprise version) and also CyberArk would be very useful.

  3. 185 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Product Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darren Aitcheson commented  · 

    This would be extremely useful for us also, since we now have a massive number of environments and don't want to have to start looking at tenants etc.

    Environment groups with associated permissions - surely this is a must-have if OD is going to be an enterprise-class tool?

  4. 166 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  Product Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darren Aitcheson commented  · 

    Ditto - we're in the same boat. We want to avoid getting managers out of bed at 4a.m. on a weekend just to have them click a button on an approval step.

    It would be superb if this could be implemented soon.

    Darren Aitcheson supported this idea  · 
  5. 17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Product Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Darren Aitcheson supported this idea  · 
  6. 365 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Consideration  ·  40 comments  ·  Product Feedback » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darren Aitcheson commented  · 

    +1 from me also.

    What would also be useful here is to have the concept of non-skippable step (apart from the manual intervention steps of course).

    Our scenario - we currently have steps that have to go at the beginning and end of all of our deployments for SOX compliance reasons. We want to give the devs access to modify their own processes, but these particular steps must always be there and mustn't be allowed to be skipped by the users.

    Some way of making that happen would be great.

  7. 21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Product Feedback » Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darren Aitcheson commented  · 

    Agreed - the ability to set Anonymous Authentication on the app pool from the UI when creating an IIS app would be perfect.

    Darren Aitcheson supported this idea  · 
  8. 72 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Product Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Darren Aitcheson supported this idea  · 
  9. 36 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Product Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Darren Aitcheson supported this idea  ·