Skip to content

Settings and activity

4 results found

  1. 183 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mathew Gallagher commented  · 

    +3 quite awhile ago. However, I never commented. This appears to be the most popular idea, but I don't think it encompasses the need for role management in general. Reusing roles by renaming them seems like a solid idea, but I would also like to be able to remove them entirely. The biggest issue here is that sometimes a odd or misspelled role is added but can not be corrected or removed. For example, today one of my engineers created a script that was supposed to utilize roles, and instead created new ones because of a code error. This does not excuse his scripting habits, but we should be able to have a way to correct the problem.

    Mathew Gallagher supported this idea  · 
  2. 120 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Mathew Gallagher supported this idea  · 
  3. 77 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Paul Stovell responded

    Hi Richard,

    There is a shortcut that can help – if you right click on a variable, there’s a Duplicate option. It doesn’t work with multiple selections however, but it should get you part of the way.

    Paul

    Mathew Gallagher supported this idea  · 
  4. 215 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Mathew Gallagher commented  · 

    This feature would be helpful. Our particular instance comes with an issue we have starting one of our Windows services. Do to old code the service manager will sometimes time out. Simply retrying the step in a guided failure usually gets it to start. Would love to automate this error test and correction.

    Mathew Gallagher supported this idea  ·