Skip to content

Settings and activity

3 results found

  1. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Feedback » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Paul Spain shared this idea  · 
  2. 214 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Consideration  ·  25 comments  ·  Product Feedback » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Paul Spain commented  · 

    How was this not a default option anyway, The world of IT can be flaky, connection drop. Files are in use, Web addresses are slow to respond, the list is endless. And having a retry system is a must.

    Pausing the deploy is so bad as it also pauses all other items behind it in the queue, and if you dont answer the question fast enough then all the other tasks behind it time out. The user prompt system makes this 'automated system' next to useless as a human needs to be there. I just want to press a button and expect to come back to a result. That's literally why we are all using this tool. Can this issue please be a top priority, It should be easy to implement as you already have the retry mechanics. just take the user step out and have a counter (x) retries before fail.

    Paul Spain supported this idea  · 
  3. 32 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Product Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Paul Spain commented  · 

    I would very much like to see the ability to run child steps in parallel in exactly the same way as steps. Not having this means i have to move what would be a child step out into a normal step so that I can run it in parallel. This works fine but means my process has lost its level of reasonability meaning that i now have to disable many steps when really what i want to disable is VM deployment or some other significant step.