Settings and activity

  1. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Product Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    There seems to be a number of UserVoice topics related to this same issue which makes the voting process difficult. I think if someone accumulated the votes across all the related topics this issue would have a much higher ranking.

    One other related topic is
    https://octopusdeploy.uservoice.com/forums/170787-general/suggestions/15957697-make-variables-groupable-collapsable

    This seems to be a "Low Hanging Fruit" which would be very helpful.

    Quite often we find variables are updated for the wrong environment. We have 5 or 6 environments, each with 40 or 50 variables. I assume people are getting lost in the massively long list of variables and accidentally updating the variable for the incorrect environment.

    The ability to expand agroup for the relevant environment should be a fairly easy task technically and would help reduce the chance for human error.

  2. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Product Feedback » Installation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    I see this only has a small number of Votes but could this be included? It's a "Low Hanging Fruit" which would be very helpful.

    Quite often we find variables are updated for the wrong environment. We have 5 or 6 environments, each with 40 or 50 variables. I assume people are getting lost in the massively long list of variables and accidentally updating the variable for the incorrect environment.

    The ability to expand agroup for the relevant environment should be a fairly easy task technically and would help reduce the chance for human error.

  3. 16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Product Feedback » Releases  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Patrick shared this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Feedback » Installation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Patrick shared this idea  · 
  5. 64 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Product Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    This is must have functionality which I would have thought would be relatively easy to include and help so many people!

    Patrick supported this idea  · 
  6. 55 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Product Feedback » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Patrick supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    I agree this is a good idea. If I update status.io at the end of my deployment with a deploy success\fail and the call to status.io fails, the deployment is considered to be a failure. However, failing to update the status.io page at the end shouldn't mark the whole deployment as a failure.

  7. 119 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    13 comments  ·  Product Feedback » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick commented  · 

    I'm surprised this feature isn't already available. Creating a parent website is a fundamental requirement for many IIS projects.

    Patrick supported this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Feedback » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Patrick shared this idea  ·