Settings and activity

  1. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Feedback » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darrell Tunnell commented  · 
    Darrell Tunnell shared this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Feedback » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darrell Tunnell commented  · 

    No feedback on this? Perhaps it has been addressed in an update?

    Darrell Tunnell shared this idea  · 
  3. 17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Product Feedback » Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darrell Tunnell commented  · 

    In addition to the feed types mentioned, proget's "universal format" feed offers a basic zip format feed, and cross platform cli, and I think it would be great if octopus could support that: https://inedo.com/upack

  4. 14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Feedback » Installation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darrell Tunnell commented  · 

    We achieve this using channels and semantic versioning for our package releases. When we release a stable release that can go to a customer - we have a channel I'm octopus that targets stable release numbers. For unstable / pre-release packages, we have a separate channel. Each channel has its own life cycle. So this results in pre-releases only being able to go to our Ci environment, but stable releases can go to Dev, Staging and Production.

  5. 28 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Product Feedback » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Darrell Tunnell shared this idea  · 
  6. 24 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Product Feedback » Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darrell Tunnell commented  · 

    - in case it wasn't obvious - i'm not suggesting octopus adds these as 3 concrete fields - i'm suggesting Octopus provides the ability for a user to define a custom set of properties held against a release, and settable at the time of release creation. I am imagining you would define this list of fields at a project level, and if you defined any, they would appear on all future release creations.

    Darrell Tunnell shared this idea  · 
  7. 179 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Product Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Darrell Tunnell supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Darrell Tunnell commented  · 

    This could help us greatly because we would be able to consolidate all our individual customer dev, uat and production environments into a "Dev" "Uat" and "Production" groups. Then with variables that we want to set appropriately depending on whether its a Dev, Uat or Production environment we would no longer need to duplicate those variables scoping them to particular environments all the time, we could just scope them at the environment group level..

  8. 25 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Product Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Darrell Tunnell supported this idea  · 
  9. 61 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    12 comments  ·  Product Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    I’ve reset the status of this suggestion, as the requirement described is for multiple dashboard configurations per-user, which Octopus does not currently support. Apologies for the misunderstanding.

    Darrell Tunnell shared this idea  ·