Raymond

My feedback

  1. 236 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  General » Deployment features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Raymond supported this idea  · 
    Raymond commented  · 

    I'd prefer to have a more robust solution based on the IIS step (but without it being tied to deploying a package, of course). Why don't you create a separate step to just create an IIS site and add that to your standard steps? Or even better: Remove the requirement of deploying a package from the IIS step altogether? You already have a standard step to deploy a package, so why also tie that requirement it to the IIS step? That would make a lot of sense to me and make the whole process a lot more flexible and suitable for enterprise usage.

  2. 87 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Raymond supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General » Setup/administration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Raymond shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base