rstraszewski

My feedback

  1. 821 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  30 comments  ·  General » Deployment features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rstraszewski commented  · 

    Any information on progress? It was started over 1.5 year ago...

    rstraszewski supported this idea  · 
    rstraszewski commented  · 

    We are also waiting for this feature. Managing 200+ projects is very hard without this. Most tools we use, have something like this (for example Teamcity). Any ETA?

  2. 555 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  General » Integration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rstraszewski supported this idea  · 
  3. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rstraszewski commented  · 

    It is really needed and I'm surprised, that this is not implemented yet. Developers should be able to configure project, but they should not be able to change Manual Intervention on TEST environment for example, or any environment they don't have permissions to.

  4. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rstraszewski supported this idea  · 
  5. 12 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rstraszewski supported this idea  · 
  6. 220 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the suggestion and for voting everyone. I’d like to get feedback on where we should go with this.

    There are a few things in Octopus that already help with this – first, it’s possible to package your NUnit tests and run them as part of a package test (we do this ourselves), or to write a PowerShell step that pings your website to see if it is online. So the actual process of performing the tests is pretty easy. Do we need to write more blog posts/documentation to show how it can be done?

    The next part is viewing the test results – in Octopus 2.0 you can “attach” files to a deployment via PowerShell which are then uploaded and available on the deployment page.

    Viewing NUnit results XML isn’t that nice though, so I guess it would be nice to be able to render those NUnit test…

    rstraszewski supported this idea  · 
  7. 60 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  General » Setup/administration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    rstraszewski supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base