Settings and activity

  1. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Product Feedback » Installation  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Blair Paine shared this idea  · 
  2. 119 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    11 comments  ·  Product Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Blair Paine supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blair Paine commented  · 

    Would love to see this. We need to execute steps under different accounts in order to take certain actions. It's less secure to give one account rights to everything needed.

  3. 14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Product Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blair Paine commented  · 

    Our business has a requirement to have all PowerShell scripts signed. This policy is forced by security software installed on deployment targets. Unfortunately without this capability we can no longer use Octopus Deploy as an enterprise application.

    Blair Paine supported this idea  · 
  4. 179 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    21 comments  ·  Product Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blair Paine commented  · 

    Our environments screen is getting very ugly very quickly as we add more and more deployment targets. We currently have over 4000 potential deployment targets in our environment across multiple environments. Groups would allow better filtering on the environments page and in other places.

    It would be fantastic if:
    - We could filter on various attributes including tenant, role, domain, connectivity status etc

    - On the tenants screens we can see which deployment targets have been assigned.

    - You could apply tags to deployment targets which can then be used to filter much like tenant tag as suggested here - https://octopusdeploy.uservoice.com/forums/170787-general/suggestions/5782511-allow-tagging-environments-with-keywords

    - More granular restrictions could be placed on which groups of deployment targets can be seen by certain teams/users.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blair Paine commented  · 

    It would be great to be able to group environments in a way that allows a "live" and "implementing" environment. For example, we often create new environments and build them in parallel to existing active environments. We may have an active Production environment and a Production environment being built but not completed/enabled/released yet. Both are considered "production", and I could have a different release deployed to each.

    When deploying a release, it should be possible to select if I am to deploy to the implementing production or the live production. If it's live production then there may be additional checks or steps.

  5. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Product Feedback » Deployments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Blair Paine supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Blair Paine commented  · 

    Recreating a release also puts the list out of order. Releases may need to be recreated because of the snapshots feature.

    Allow the any page listing the releases or release drop downs to be sorted by the release version number rather than the assembled date. If simple enough, you could also allow releases to be sorted by other properties.

    Our problem/issue is posted here:
    http://help.octopusdeploy.com/discussions/problems/50250-release-ordering-not-by-release-number

  6. 14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Product Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Blair Paine supported this idea  ·