Matt Ford

My feedback

  1. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General » Deployment features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matt Ford shared this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General » Setup/administration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matt Ford shared this idea  · 
  3. 369 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    12 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matt Ford supported this idea  · 
    Matt Ford commented  · 

    Just came across this in my first project going into Live where we want an approver and to use the scheduling ability :(

    Why are there so few votes and what do others do in this situation if they're not bothered by this?

  4. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General » Setup/administration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matt Ford shared this idea  · 
  5. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General » Deployment features  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matt Ford shared this idea  · 
  6. 447 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    21 comments  ·  General » Setup/administration  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Matt Ford supported this idea  · 
    Matt Ford commented  · 

    Just ran into this one now and it is quite annoying. Project Team will have the ability to change the Library Variables which could affect every project we do, just so they can have the ability to edit their own Project Variables.

    Out of votes too :(

  7. 220 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for the suggestion and for voting everyone. I’d like to get feedback on where we should go with this.

    There are a few things in Octopus that already help with this – first, it’s possible to package your NUnit tests and run them as part of a package test (we do this ourselves), or to write a PowerShell step that pings your website to see if it is online. So the actual process of performing the tests is pretty easy. Do we need to write more blog posts/documentation to show how it can be done?

    The next part is viewing the test results – in Octopus 2.0 you can “attach” files to a deployment via PowerShell which are then uploaded and available on the deployment page.

    Viewing NUnit results XML isn’t that nice though, so I guess it would be nice to be able to render those NUnit test…

    Matt Ford supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base