Skip to content

Product Feedback

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

522 results found

  1. We often have the case, where a release has been cleared from QAT, but we continue development on QAT until the deployment date comes along a few days later. As it currently stands, there is no way for us to prevent the lifecycle retention policy from removing that release, once we start deploying the releases from the next sprint to QAT. In other words, unless a release is kept as deployed in an environment, we run the risk of it getting deleted by the retention policy.

    It would be extremely helpful to be able to mark a release as "retain…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  2. It would be very nice to extend the Azure Web App style of deployment to also virtual machines. I would like to create an environment and targets in Octopus Deploy and assign roles to the targets before they exist. Then during deployment the machines would be created with Terraform, install tentacles and register to Octopus with the assigned roles. After that Octopus would deploy the actual software.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  3. When a deploying a release, have different greens (the green tick) when the step passed but was not deployed:
    - Same version already on tenant
    - Newer version on tenant.

    Otherwise, and since it is not evident, one has to open every of the step and, at least, check the duration of the step.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  4. It would be very useful to be able to use variables to specify the Drop Folder Path, Applications Directory, Working Directory, and Sensitive variables password so they can be centrally set for a related group of offline file drop target.

    Suggestion after an original support request https://help.octopus.com/t/using-variables-in-target-definition/19031

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  5. When adding an interruption step to a master project (one which has many deploy release steps), it should acquire all the packages in the child deployment steps.

    Alternatively run all deploy release steps in parallel (roughly 100 in my case so need to edit the max parallel projects), and have a step which allows you to accept all manual interruption, but in small blocks of 5-10 to avoid issues.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  6. In a master project that includes Deploy Release steps, we can define per deploy release step variables that will be available to steps within the child deployment's process.
    We'd like to have variables on the master project level that will override the same variables child deployment's process so we won't have to do it for every step.
    For example - if I have a master project with 10 deploy release steps, and each step has a db connection string variable, currently i have to go into each deploy release step and update the connection string. We'd like to see it…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  7. Private Key Access which define who has access to the private-key on the target machine on the import certificate step could have a scope option.
    So each environment different certificate with different user and permission

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  8. I would like to be able to add a tenant tag to a project link on a tenant. Our tenants have 2 projects associated with them QA and Dev. Currently when I use a tenant tag the QA tester using that tenant will get access to the feature the developer using that tenant gets. This will in most cases cause the deployment to fail because the QA tester for that tenant may be completely unrelated to the developers project.

    If I could put tags on a project link it would allow me to say the developer using tenant 25 gets…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  9. The feature by which we can compare the features between one build with the other. What are the differences in the build between the two versions of the build.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  10. Currently the columns on the dashboard seem the have a fixed width.
    This works fine for environments and releases but for the project icon and name it sometimes causes double lines when it's not necessary.

    We have 5 environments and on a 1920x1080 resolution screen almost 25% of the row is empty.

    Could you change is so that the project icon and name using a 'auto' width sizing.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  11. Sometimes, developers cancel the onging release deployment. In some cases, the deployment is interrupted in the middle of step execution and changes cannot be reverted easily afterwords. For example, there is one step to restore the database and run some cleaning sql queries. The deployment was cancelled right in the middle when powershell script turned the database in a single user mode and started to restore it. Deployment was cancelled and the database was left in that state. It was required manual intervention to login and revert changes.

    My idea is to add possibility to mark the step as atomic…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  12. Receive an email when a error occurred in deployment .

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  13. With multiple tenants, we use the same ARM template to lay down common infrastructure and then leverage tenant features. The problem is that if 2 or more tenants hit the ARM template step at the same time that part of the deployment fails. It would be great if we could define a step "mutex" so that only one tenant can be executing a step at a time. I've been trying to prototype as a powershell child step but I can't seem to figure out how to lookup other tenant deploys in the Octopus API.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  14. Currently the Release Variable snapshot screen does not show Tenant Project Template variables. It would bee good to see these so we can ensure changes are in effect before re-releasing after an update.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  15. my only annoyance with Octopus is when I try to push something from one environment to another and I get that dreaded "something has changed" warning.

    perhaps Octopus can tell us what changed? thanks!

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  16. When creating a new release, if any variables have changed since the last release then a warning box should be shown saying that "Variables have changed since the last snapshot" and have the option to view these changes.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  17. Frequently, when DevOps is deploying a release to Production they encounter the classic Warning:
    --> "The deployment process has changed since this snapshot was taken."

    This triggers a fire drill where dev, ops, and qa need to figure out what changed, when, and if the change is retro-actively required in previously issued releases. Generally the exercise results in dev identifying the small change and that the change is required going forward (vNext) but NOT needed last quarter's release. We have to manually download the json snapshots and load them into text diff tool. It's tedious and time consuming. It's awesome…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  18. When using the "Run a Script" step with a script from a package the input field for the script parameters is a single-line textbox.

    It would be a lot better if the textbox was multi-line (or at the very least resizable) to make entering more than a handful parameters possible without always scrolling.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  19. To support the introduction or removal of deployment steps while continuing to support for new builds of older configurations it would be nice to be able to set a step to only run for specific release versions.

    While channels can be twisted to support this use case it requires significant setup and management on the CI server that publishes and creates the builds.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →
  20. I see that there is a "rolling deployment" windows size on each step in the process, but that doesn't make much sense to me. I feel that I want ALL of the steps to run, but for a specified number of machines on the deploy release deployment screen. The screen that allows you to skip certain steps. An example of what I am referring to: https://app.box.com/s/x3y4n9iukx15mavz4yjasrdbt5eyae8p

    Basically, if we have 20 targets in an environment, I could specify a rolling windows of 2 for that environment, and Octopus would perform ALL of the steps for two machines at a time.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Deployments  ·  Admin →