Currently when deploying a project containing one or more Deploy Release steps (https://octopus.com/docs/deployment-process/coordinating-multiple-projects/deploy-release-step), there is no ability to preview the deployment steps that will be executed in the child deployment, nor the ability to exclude machines from the child deployment.

It would be nice to surface this information on the create-deployment page of the parent project.

So sensitive project variables will be referenced from Azure Key Vault instead of being stored in octopus.

https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/key-vault

3357461 - 'Azure Resource Manager Key Vault support' was only about ARM template Key Vault support.
17973586 - 'Integrate Octopus deploy with secrets managment system Vault' is similar to this issue only for https://www.vaultproject.io

This idea is similar to
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/vsts/build-release/concepts/library/variable-groups?view=vsts#link-secrets-from-an-azure-key-vault-as-variables

When adding a binding to IIS in Octopus, you can only use seperate variable. Every binding needs a new variable. Some of our deployments have over 50 bindings. We create each binding separate. If we use a variable list only the last item of the list end up in de IIS binding. It would help us a lot if we could ad three generic bindings (Test, Acceptation, Production), en in the bindings use a variable list, containing all the IIS bindings.

Allow package deploy steps to select multiple packages that are deployed in the selected order (with the ability to change the order). We have a website where we deploy a clean copy of a vendors files (makes upgrades easier), then we overlay different 3rd party modules and our solution into the same folder. These packages together create a whole website.

We keep our deployment configurations in octopus variables and use json substitution the replace them on deploy time

This could be improved in a few ways:

- Use the json variables substitution feature on other step templates than deploy a package (for example: run a script)
- have to ability to substitute also yml files
- give a variable a null value, the only option now is tho give him empty string, which influence the code.

I would like to see the "pipeline as code approach" applied to projects. The main idea is to be possible to define the process of a project using a yml file in a source code repository or package.

The Tasks screen has various filters, but the appears no way to filter to display only the Successful task that had warnings. I was to be able to audit warnings periodically to uncover common flake issues and maybe address them.

This is using v2018.3

On the process definition page for Octopus Deploy projects, please show a confirmation dialog when the user attempts to delete a parent process/step containing multiple child steps.
Prompting the user to confirm deleting n child steps would be a helpful feature to prevent an accidental deletion.

The 'Deploy to Service Fabric' process does not provide all the available security mode options available in Service Fabric, we are doing a POC around an on-premise SF cluster using a gMSA which the Fabric will run under the context of and Windows Identities to allow client-to-node communication. the option for using Windows Credentials (in this case it would be the Windows Service Account which Octopus is running under the context of) to connect to the cluster is not available! i.e.

Connect-ServiceFabricCluster -ConnectionEndpoint <cluster-domain-name | server hostname>:19000 -WindowsCredential

It would be great to have the option to switch to a dark theme

We set a datetime in a javascript file that controls our countdown timer on our offline page during deployments. Our deployment guys asks if it is possible to have a calendar and time control to select the correct values instead of entering it manually to prevent incorrect formatting and user error.

Thank you

alter the current Runs on targets in roles to require thee environment to have all of the roles specified.

Your latest version is disaster! Total disaster!

Could you add a filter for 'Environments' in addition to the current 'Project' and 'Project group' filters?

We have a lot of environments in our Octoups installation (because we started using octopus prior to the tenants feature) and with the new virtualized dashboard columns we are no longer able to search for specific environments on the dashboard. We need this to be able to see what version is currently deployed to a specific environment.

After upgrading to this new version of Octopus, with the new UI, the configuration of tenanted variables became very counter-intuitive, it's very heavy while loading multiple projects and the color pallet makes it even harder to understand which environment is which, but the color pallet it's an issue in general with all of the UI of this new version, it's very confusing as you cannot distinguish easily between projects, tenants, variables, environments, etc.

Currently the dashboard can get quit full if you have a lot of applications even if you sort filter them by project. It should be possible to filter the dashboard by more optiones then just project.
Ideal filteroptions would be Timestamp of deployment, Timeframe for deyploments, environment, other tags like traget roles.