OST file is one of the database files used by Microsoft Outlook. Its main purpose is to serve as an enabler for working offline even when the connection to Exchange is not live. In such scenarios, the changes you make are later synced to the Exchange Server when the connection is back live.

If there are any errors or corruption issues in the OST file, the information stored within it comes under risk. This is mainly due to the fact that OST files, unlike PST files, cannot be opened independently of the Outlook profile that created them.

So in all such scenarios, what we need is a tool that can Convert OST file to PST. The resultant PST file can then be easily imported into any version of Outlook and its contents viewed. To accomplish this, you will need an tool that can easily extract all the information from within your OST file including mails, calendar, tasks, journals, contacts etc and flawlessly convert it to Outlook PST file.

EdbMails OST to PST Converter tool with its simple to use user interface can accomplish this for you. Along with support for most versions of Exchange and Outlook, it also supports 64 bit windows operating systems. What’s more novel about the OST to PST tool is that it allows direct OST migration to Office 365 as well as Live Exchange Server.

EdbMails preserves the folder structure intact and also lets you view all the contents of the OST file within the application. There are extensive filtering options by date, subject, attachments etc that you can apply to the mails before export to PST file

For keeping the Exchange Online mailbox safe, it is crucial to export Office 365 mailbox to PST and keep its backup locally. This prevents O365 accidental data loss from any kind of issue or human error. Usage of the eDiscovery tool is one way to migrate Office 365 to PST format. Another method is taking the help of Office 365 Export PST software such as the MailsDaddy Office 365 Backup Tool. An error-free utility that resolves all Exchange Online backup process issues and gives the successful result. While migrating Office 365 mailbox to PST Outlook it preserves the HTML formatting and the file structure of the PST file. The tool provides solutions for both Exchange Online Administrator and the User through their valid login credentials. The Admin via a CSV file can process a secure Office 365 backup to PST implementing multiple exports of O365 to PST. Know more: https://www.mailsdaddy.com/office-365-backup/

Please add the name of the worker machine to the task log when a deployment is made. It is a small change which I think will be easy to add.

Reason/Rationale/Context: We were working without workers/worker pool and we just had a few deployments that we were setting up to run on our Octopus server. My colleague added a worker and without me noticing what I thought was running on the Octopus server was moved to the worker. I knew I had the dependencies my script needed installed via Octopus on the Octopus Server (like a trusted root certificate and others) and I couldn't figure out why the PowerShell script wasn't working. I had a hard time figuring out why. I finally added $env:computername to my PowerShell script only to learn that it was running on the worker instead of the Octopus server. I think if the name of the worker would have shown in the Task Log, I might have figured this out faster and saved myself hours of consternation. (I noticed it is visible from the Raw view, but I didn't think I had a need to look at that.)

It would be great if the Octopus dashboard, which displays the current releases of each application in each environment, contained links to the applications in the specific environments. E.g. if the box displaying details of the most recent deployment of Application X to Environment Y also contained a link to that app in that environment

We presently maintain this info outside of Octopus, in Wiki pages etc, but it’s a pain to maintain.
It would be great if this was directly available in Octopus, because the matrix of applications to environments is already there. Forcing users to access the links via Octopus would also have the advantage of making sure they know the version they are accessing too (we do display the version numbers in our apps also, but you know what I mean).

Was thinking if “Application URL” was a property of a deployment, and there was some means of setting that property as part of the deployment process steps (say via a step type), then the dashboard could check if the URL for deployments had been set, and if so display a link. Also has the benefit that if the URL needs to change with a given release, that can be controlled like other changes

I think a lot of customers would find this a useful feature… there is nothing special about our situation, maybe just that we have a lot of environments and a lot of apps, making the problem more important to solve

ATS OST Converter saves recover OST mailbox items into various file formats such as HTML, MSG, EML, vCal, etc. Using this tool, one can also repair their corrupted OST files, recover deleted items, and migrate OST to Office 365, Outlook Stores, and Live Exchange Server. Try a trial version of this tool to convert the first 30 items per folder. ATS OST to PST file different then you can rapidly defeat your rinsing, calendar, emails, or additional dominant group by Best OST to PST Exporter Online Software. This means constituent definitely manners out when you are the procedure to your OST into Outlook PST. This utility current profession completely to recommend all Offline OST file into Outlook PST. Know more about software from.

Read More: https://www.bulkecommerce.com/store/ats-ost-to-pst-converter-software-159.html

Currently our workflow for indicating/knowing what app/s need to be deployed for a Jira issue or a Jira release (of multiple issues) is to manually enter/bundle up these from the Jira issue descriptions which we fill out.

What would be amazing though would be if the Octopus Jira integration plugin rendered a smart "section" into the Jira issue, where you could (1) select which apps need to be deployed (from Octopus), and (2) then get a read-only envs+releases matrix like in the octo dashboard so people can see where it's deployed currently.

Furthermore, on the Jira release/deployment page (assuming this can be extended), rendering the superset matrix of all apps needing to be deployed for that release given all tickets in it.

A++, and super complicated for various reasons like ordering, would be being able to create an Octopus "superset release" with a click from that screen, that could then be edited to re-order some things as needed given dependencies, then fired from Octopus (or Jira for that matter).

Finally, depending on Jira workflow support, it'd be cool too if we could tighten this even further and allow workflows to be setup whereby you can't progress an issue into "Ready to deploy" or say give it a release version if the apps to deploy list hasn't been completed.

The OctoPack project is great for Framework projects. We add the nuget dependency to select projects and add /p:RunOctoPack=true to our build script. The build script does not need to be updated for every new, removed or renamed octo-packed project.

SDK projects are less automated. After building, we have to run dotnet publish, then octo pack for each project. It would be great to define 1 build script, then update the projects as needed to pack or not.

Idea to attain goal:

1. Add element <IsOctoPackable>true</IsOctoPackable> in csproj that works similar to IsPackable.




2. Allow dot net octo pack to point to the csproj, multiple csproj, or the sln. Perform actions on any projects with IsOctoPack==true.




3. Add option --no-publish (following --nobuild and --no-restore convention)




4. Call dotnet publish (unless --no-publish was specified), passing on applicable parameters




5. Derive basePath from output/{projectName} folder (publish will create a directory with the project name in the --output folder).




6. Derive id from OctoPackageId (new csproj property), AssemblyName, or Project Name (AssemblyName is project name if missing).

I am on a cloud account using shared worker pools. This is great, but using shared pools means Octopus Infrastructure is running my deployments and I need to wait for a worker to free up.
Also shared workers do not have a fixed IP so I cannot limit the IP addresses that can communicate with my Kubernetes Master, an attack vector I would like to close.

It would be great if when setting up a Kubernetes cluster, my Octopus cloud account asks if it can run workers inside my cluster.

An issue with this is that the worker will run on a node who's IP is generally ephemeral, so this will only really work if the cluster has a network configured with a static IP.